Tom over at European Auto Source has done a very comprehensive review on the AST lowering springs. I haven't come across any AST customer reviews, so I guess this is the first.
I just hit 50k miles, so warranty is over which means it's time to mod!
Quickly, the purpose of lowering springs is for aesthetic but also for performance. Some of you may be leaning towards one more than the other. For me, it was more of performance that I was looking for. My previous experience has been running Koni Yellows with H&R springs on a 2002 Toyota Rav4 and TEIN Basic coilover kit on a 2005 Mercedes C230 Kompressor Sports Sedan. This is the first time I've ever owned a lowered car with only springs so I wasn't sure what to expect as far as performance nor longevity of the rest of the suspension components - still don't but time will tell.
I don't have H&R's to compare the AST's to, but I can tell you from riding on AST's on installation day for about 45 miles that the ride is very close to stock. In fact, anyone who sits in the car or drives it won't be able to tell anything has changed. I can barely tell myself. It's that similar. In a way though that was a bit disappointing to me. I was hoping for a stiffer ride so that the car doesn't sit back before it moves off the line.
The i3 isn't exactly a popular car for modding so I suspect the community here may not be that technical as far as mods go. I'm sure some of you gear heads know a ton more than me so I'm not saying I'm the expert but wanted to just discuss some basics before going in depth with the AST lowering springs application on the i3 REX.
ABOUT SUSPENSION (skip this part if you know this stuff already and go straight to the review section below)
A stiffer ride typically accentuates the terrain. On smooth roads, a stiff suspension will feel super smooth. On rough roads, you can almost count all the bugs you run over. Stiff suspension is less bouncy but more jaring. I like to think of it like jumping on the floor vs jumping on the bed. When you jump on the floor, there's no bounce. Your body absorbs the full drop as your feet hit the floor. Jumping on the bed however is followed by more bouncing. There's a lot less force on your legs, but your body will bounce over and over until the momentum dies off.
So with stiffer suspension, every bounce is aggressive and you'll feel it to the bone. Once you hit uneven terrain, you experience the terrain and then it's over (until you hit the next one). Softer suspension will be more bouncy. You experience less degree of impact but each impact extends in duration. Big bounce followed by more bouncing, each progressively softer.
SPRINGS FOR LOOKS
My guess is that most people here feel that the stock suspension is already pretty stiff and are considering springs mainly for looks. If that's you, then the AST's will be it. Don't think too much about it - just get it. Generally lowering springs need to be stiffer b/c as it reduces the space between the tire and the inside of the wheel well, it needs to be stiffer so the car doesn't bottom out. The science of all this with manufacturers is to find the balance of exactly how low vs how stiff.
SPRINGS FOR PERFORMANCE
Wish suspension upgrades, I'd want the car to not sit back at launch. Generally when a stock car accelerates, the car will sit back briefly on the rear wheels before actually moving forward. I'd rather the car just move forward initially without sitting back and because of that, I like upgrading the suspension.
When stopping, the opposite happens. Stock cars will dive down at abrupt stops. All the weight goes to the front wheels and the car literally dives down. It's very aparent when looking at the car from the side. A car with stiffer suspension won't have to experience that. Instead of diving down on the soft front suspension, the stiffer setup allows the car to just stop.
The third component of course is turning. On a turn, the car naturally puts more force on the outside wheels compressing the suspension components which include the spring. If the spring can be stiffer, you can imagine that there's less body roll b/c it's fighting or pushing back against the road.
AST LOWERING SPRINGS REVIEW
The ride is as soft as stock. You're not really going to notice a difference even if you're looking for it. I'm still not certain I can tell the difference yet, albeit I'm not taking sharp turns and not driving aggressively on my way home from the shop with kids. Again, if you're looking for a stock "feel", just get these AST springs. If you share the car with a counterpart, I'd be surprised if they noticed the difference at all.
Since I'm lowering the car for performance, it was a little disappointing that the setup isn't noticeably stiffer. But then again, this is the first time I've lowered a car with only springs so may this is the "norm" of what to expect. I'm just used to entire suspension components being swapped out which has a huge impact. I have read that customers of H&R have complained about their setup being too stiff so I'm assuming it's noticeably different. As I'm the primary driver of the i3 (wife has driven it a total of 8 times in 16 or so months), maybe I should've gone with H&R after all.
CONCLUSION
If you're reason for getting springs is performance oriented, I'd probably recommend the H&R's even though I myself haven't ridden on them before.
If you're reason for getting springs is more about looks and you're not looking for any performance differences or may even be worried about it making the car too stiff, then the AST's are the perfect fit.
Pics to follow. It's nothing surprising. About a 1" drop on all corners. The car was just lowered today, so nothing substantial to show off yet. Just wanted to get the review out there.
I just hit 50k miles, so warranty is over which means it's time to mod!
Quickly, the purpose of lowering springs is for aesthetic but also for performance. Some of you may be leaning towards one more than the other. For me, it was more of performance that I was looking for. My previous experience has been running Koni Yellows with H&R springs on a 2002 Toyota Rav4 and TEIN Basic coilover kit on a 2005 Mercedes C230 Kompressor Sports Sedan. This is the first time I've ever owned a lowered car with only springs so I wasn't sure what to expect as far as performance nor longevity of the rest of the suspension components - still don't but time will tell.
I don't have H&R's to compare the AST's to, but I can tell you from riding on AST's on installation day for about 45 miles that the ride is very close to stock. In fact, anyone who sits in the car or drives it won't be able to tell anything has changed. I can barely tell myself. It's that similar. In a way though that was a bit disappointing to me. I was hoping for a stiffer ride so that the car doesn't sit back before it moves off the line.
The i3 isn't exactly a popular car for modding so I suspect the community here may not be that technical as far as mods go. I'm sure some of you gear heads know a ton more than me so I'm not saying I'm the expert but wanted to just discuss some basics before going in depth with the AST lowering springs application on the i3 REX.
ABOUT SUSPENSION (skip this part if you know this stuff already and go straight to the review section below)
A stiffer ride typically accentuates the terrain. On smooth roads, a stiff suspension will feel super smooth. On rough roads, you can almost count all the bugs you run over. Stiff suspension is less bouncy but more jaring. I like to think of it like jumping on the floor vs jumping on the bed. When you jump on the floor, there's no bounce. Your body absorbs the full drop as your feet hit the floor. Jumping on the bed however is followed by more bouncing. There's a lot less force on your legs, but your body will bounce over and over until the momentum dies off.
So with stiffer suspension, every bounce is aggressive and you'll feel it to the bone. Once you hit uneven terrain, you experience the terrain and then it's over (until you hit the next one). Softer suspension will be more bouncy. You experience less degree of impact but each impact extends in duration. Big bounce followed by more bouncing, each progressively softer.
SPRINGS FOR LOOKS
My guess is that most people here feel that the stock suspension is already pretty stiff and are considering springs mainly for looks. If that's you, then the AST's will be it. Don't think too much about it - just get it. Generally lowering springs need to be stiffer b/c as it reduces the space between the tire and the inside of the wheel well, it needs to be stiffer so the car doesn't bottom out. The science of all this with manufacturers is to find the balance of exactly how low vs how stiff.
SPRINGS FOR PERFORMANCE
Wish suspension upgrades, I'd want the car to not sit back at launch. Generally when a stock car accelerates, the car will sit back briefly on the rear wheels before actually moving forward. I'd rather the car just move forward initially without sitting back and because of that, I like upgrading the suspension.
When stopping, the opposite happens. Stock cars will dive down at abrupt stops. All the weight goes to the front wheels and the car literally dives down. It's very aparent when looking at the car from the side. A car with stiffer suspension won't have to experience that. Instead of diving down on the soft front suspension, the stiffer setup allows the car to just stop.
The third component of course is turning. On a turn, the car naturally puts more force on the outside wheels compressing the suspension components which include the spring. If the spring can be stiffer, you can imagine that there's less body roll b/c it's fighting or pushing back against the road.
AST LOWERING SPRINGS REVIEW
The ride is as soft as stock. You're not really going to notice a difference even if you're looking for it. I'm still not certain I can tell the difference yet, albeit I'm not taking sharp turns and not driving aggressively on my way home from the shop with kids. Again, if you're looking for a stock "feel", just get these AST springs. If you share the car with a counterpart, I'd be surprised if they noticed the difference at all.
Since I'm lowering the car for performance, it was a little disappointing that the setup isn't noticeably stiffer. But then again, this is the first time I've lowered a car with only springs so may this is the "norm" of what to expect. I'm just used to entire suspension components being swapped out which has a huge impact. I have read that customers of H&R have complained about their setup being too stiff so I'm assuming it's noticeably different. As I'm the primary driver of the i3 (wife has driven it a total of 8 times in 16 or so months), maybe I should've gone with H&R after all.
CONCLUSION
If you're reason for getting springs is performance oriented, I'd probably recommend the H&R's even though I myself haven't ridden on them before.
If you're reason for getting springs is more about looks and you're not looking for any performance differences or may even be worried about it making the car too stiff, then the AST's are the perfect fit.
Pics to follow. It's nothing surprising. About a 1" drop on all corners. The car was just lowered today, so nothing substantial to show off yet. Just wanted to get the review out there.