SanSerif
Well-known member
Hmm. One thing I've learned over the past 3 months of EV-ing is that maths and logic don't actually fare very well when talking about range. But the figures and hypotheticals don't stack up against my real life experience.
I've had almost 160 motorway miles from one charge and one tank. OK, it wasn't sub-zero[1] but it wasn't warm either - and the car was 4-up plus luggage. And I've done the trip twice so it wasn't a fluke!
On a day-to-day level, I find the REx gets very, very rarely used. But it does mean that I'm happy to arrive home with 5 miles of battery left. So there's some sort of virtual benefit there.
Overall, I think the REx is a marvellous solution to the cost and volume limitations of batteries. It means I don't need a second car (or the hassle of hiring one). It means I get instant on the road "charging" on long trips and don't have to sweat a dubious public charging network. Altogether, well worth £3k (or whatever it was).
[1] And if sub-zero kills the case for the REx, then surely it double kills it for the raw EV?
I've had almost 160 motorway miles from one charge and one tank. OK, it wasn't sub-zero[1] but it wasn't warm either - and the car was 4-up plus luggage. And I've done the trip twice so it wasn't a fluke!
On a day-to-day level, I find the REx gets very, very rarely used. But it does mean that I'm happy to arrive home with 5 miles of battery left. So there's some sort of virtual benefit there.
Overall, I think the REx is a marvellous solution to the cost and volume limitations of batteries. It means I don't need a second car (or the hassle of hiring one). It means I get instant on the road "charging" on long trips and don't have to sweat a dubious public charging network. Altogether, well worth £3k (or whatever it was).
[1] And if sub-zero kills the case for the REx, then surely it double kills it for the raw EV?