wildcamper
New member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2024
- Messages
- 1
I'm based in the UK and have a 2017 model of the BMW i3, 94aH battery (60,000 miles).
I'm looking at the cost of my BMW fuel consumption compared with our other family vehicle, which is a 1.5 litre SkyActiv Mazda 2, 2016 model with 40,000 miles on the clock.
The BMW consumption is about 14kWh/100km and the Mazda about 52 mpg, which covers to approx 5.5 litres/100km.
We currently pay about £1.50/litre for petrol and public charging for electric is about 80p/kWh.
Therefore comparative costs per 100km are -
BMW = 14 x £0.8 = £11.20
Mazda = 5.5 x £1.50 = £8.25
As prices for electricity have rocketed since the war started in Ukraine, I am not surprised by this result.
I don't think other running costs for an ICE vehicle would make up for this 25% higher fuel economy cost, so this is a clear disincentive, from my point of view, to owning an electric vehicle.
Does anybody else have any other evidence of comparisons between the fuel running costs for electric v ICE vehicle?
I'm looking at the cost of my BMW fuel consumption compared with our other family vehicle, which is a 1.5 litre SkyActiv Mazda 2, 2016 model with 40,000 miles on the clock.
The BMW consumption is about 14kWh/100km and the Mazda about 52 mpg, which covers to approx 5.5 litres/100km.
We currently pay about £1.50/litre for petrol and public charging for electric is about 80p/kWh.
Therefore comparative costs per 100km are -
BMW = 14 x £0.8 = £11.20
Mazda = 5.5 x £1.50 = £8.25
As prices for electricity have rocketed since the war started in Ukraine, I am not surprised by this result.
I don't think other running costs for an ICE vehicle would make up for this 25% higher fuel economy cost, so this is a clear disincentive, from my point of view, to owning an electric vehicle.
Does anybody else have any other evidence of comparisons between the fuel running costs for electric v ICE vehicle?