BobDowser said:
Our Insight has the MIMA/PIMA system onboard, although for short trips it's not of much use.
I used MIMA extensively while driving ~30k miles on European highways. I probably shortened the lives of the battery cells by working them so hard that their temperature climbed as high as 50º C during warm highway driving. The battery pack cooling fan was insufficient for controlling battery cell temperatures during heavy MIMA use. I turned off MIMA when the battery temperature reached 50º C and left the ignition on so the cooling fan remained on while stopping for gasoline, food, whatever. Oh, well, I averaged 62 mpg over 40k miles including some 80 mph driving on European highways which was too fast for much lean burn operation.
BobDowser said:
Two heat pumps in the BEV versus only one (for the battery pack) in the.REx. Now the disparate mileage figures I had seen for BEV versus REx make some sense, especially in colder weather.
A refrigerant compressor, evaporator, and condenser could be considered to be a heat pump even when the evaporator is cooling the battery pack and/or cabin, so maybe you're counting cooling mode as one heat pump and heating mode as a second heat pump. There's only one set of heat pump plumbing in a BEV with the heat pump option (standard on early U.S. BEV's but optional on later BEV's) and no heat pump plumbing on any Rex. This plumbing reverses the refrigerant flow so that a condenser in cooling mode becomes an evaporator in heating mode and an evaporator in cooling mode becomes a condenser in heating mode. What's especially cool about the i3's heat pump design is that the battery pack can be cooled at the same time that the cabin is being heated, so both heating and cooling modes can operate simultaneously. The diagrams on pp.44-48 in the
I01 Heating and A/C Systems Training Manual show these operational modes quite clearly.
BobDowser said:
I had thought it was due to just the extra weight of an engine and fuel.
The REx's additional 300 lb. of weight does reduce its range a bit compared with a BEV, but more efficient winter heating might have a larger impact. Note that heat pump heating becomes less efficient as ambient temperatures decrease. Below 14º F, a balmy Minnesota winter day
, the electric resistance heater replaces the heat pump as a source of cabin heat. So on colder winter days, a BEV wouldn't be much more efficient than a REx.
BobDowser said:
If I can't get the pack heated up except by plugging in, or depemding on the slight heating of internal battery resistance during driving, perhaps the extra range of the 120AHr BEV pack, and up to 10% extra range from heat pump cabin heat, make more sense overall.
If you can find a 2019 i3 BEV with the options that you want, it would seem to meet your needs without the additional complexity, weight, and unreliability of a REx.
BobDowser said:
There was no mention of anything other than resistance heating for cold weather use in the battery pack for either the BEV or REX versions, but I may have missed something.
That's what I have read as well. I don't know whether starting an i3 in advance of departing when the ambient temperature is very low would allow the battery pack heating elements to increase the battery cell temperature enough to increase the driving efficiency enough to offset the energy provided by the battery pack to heat itself. This probably depends on how long the drive is, the ambient temperature, etc. The battery pack is quite dense and requires quite a bit of energy to increase its temperature, so it might not make energy consumption sense to consume battery pack energy to heat the battery pack. I believe that battery pack preheating can take 3 hours to increase the battery pack temperature to the 50º battery pack heating shut-off temperature when the ambient temperature is particularly cold. Hopefully, someone with cold weather i3 operation experience will comment.[/quote]