ultraturtle said:
Assuming you are in the U.S., you would need a generator capable of at least 15 A (1.8kW) continuous and 20 A (2.4kW) peak. You are smart to choose an inverter based model, which would address any power quality concerns...
I forgot about the 1.4 kW (12 amp) Level 1 standard, so there is an outside chance the EU2000i might work, but there are a few "ifs":
- - If the supplied BMW EVSE is a 12 amp (rather than 16 amp) unit. This is likely. BMW will not want to deal with complaints of blown circuit breakers as owners likely do not have many 20 amp circuits, and will likely ignore BMW instructions not to share other loads on the charging circuit.
- If the gen-set can in fact sustain a continuous 1.4 kW load. It is only rated at 1.6, so we are talking about 87% capacity. I have this unit's bigger brother, the EU3000is, and have found it necessary to reduce the load to 85% of its rated continuous output, or it will overload and shut itself down every couple of minutes
- If environmental conditions are ideal. Any atmospheric pressure or temperature deviation from ideal will lower the gen-set's maximum output.
- If, in fact the power is electrically "clean" enough. Under high load, it needs to maintain stable voltage, frequency, and approximate sine wave output closely.
In my opinion, not likely, but possible.
Surge said:
Smell - if you keep it in a box it won't smell.
Keeping any gasoline supply contained inside a fully enclosed container is dangerous. It must be vented, or you face an explosion hazard as pressure and temperature change. Whenever the generator is aboard, you face a choice between dealing with constant gasoline fumes or having your car explode now and then.
Surge said:
Honda generators have an inverter and very likely generate cleaner power than our household AC.
Probably not. Grid power is pure sine wave. Any inverter can only approximate it, and an inexpensive one such as on the EU2000i is not likely to approximate it well.
Speaking of "clean", small gasoline generators are ridiculously polluting devices. I already mentioned that the REx gen-set is roughly 74% more efficient than this portable unit, meaning that it will generate approximately 74% more kWh per gallon of gas. What I did not mention is that the EU2000i spews over a hundred times the pollution per kWh as the REx gen-set. Here's the math:
- The 99cc gasoline engine output of the EU2000i generates 15.8 grams of Hydrocarbons plus Oxides of Nitrogen per kWh. (http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/offroad/cert/cert_results.php?order=0) This is only the input to the generator side of the gen-set, so after generator efficiency losses it actually emits more guck per kWh of electricity generation.
We don't yet have numbers for the REx, but we do know that its sophisticated emissions control system allows it to meet CARB SULEV criteria (0.010 g/mi hydrocarbon plus 0.020 g/mi NOx = 0.030 g/mi total, see page 49 of http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/levprog/cleandoc/cleancomplete lev-ghg regs 4-13.pdf), so assuming (again from CARB specs) that it gets 4.0 miles per kWh (75mi/18.8kWh), its worst case emissions would be:
4.0 mi/kWh x 0.030 g/mi = 0.120 g/kWh
15.8 divided by 0.120 is 132, so best case, the portable generator emits more than 132 times the harmful emissions per unit of power than the REx gen-set.
So many people talk about the "purity" of a BEV vs REx, that I sometimes forget that they place battery powered locomotion as having some inherent value in itself, and not as merely a helpful contributor to a greater good such as environmental responsibility. For me, and I suspect a great many others, the REx is far and away the more environmentally responsible choice. For those that will never have to exceed a 30 mile radius from their primary charging point, or are willing to go through the hassle of renting (expensively through BMW 360, or inexpensively through a local rental company) when they need to go farther, the BEV is a great pick. Anyone that needs to venture further, however, is now burdening the planet with not only the embodied energy and pollution of a second, fossil fuel powered vehicle, but the mile by mile pollution it generates. Consider a round trip to a destination 40 miles away. A REx owner would be able to make that trip 75 miles on electricity and only 5 miles on gas, whereas a BEV owner would need to take the gas burner and operate the entire 80 miles on gasoline - 16 times the gasoline usage of the REx.
In many ways, the REx is the "purer" EV. For a very reasonable price, no volume penalty, and about the weight of an adult passenger and his stuff, it is the smartest way I can think of to avoid having to own a second car.
I believe your portable generator solution to be a really bad idea for many reasons, but am curious to see how it turns out. Keep us posted!