The steep residential hill I referenced earlier I drove today then measured. It's a 14% slope, losing 100 ft over a 700 ft run. The i3 descends it at a constant 21 MPH with no accelerator nor brake inputs from me, just "natural" regen.
Despite the constant speed, the brake lamps come on and remain on the entire 23 seconds of this descent.
You've provided strong evidence that the brake lights are illuminated when the regen power exceeds a certain level even when the deceleration rate is 0.
I could argue that brake lights should not be tied to regen power but only to deceleration rate. They should illuminate
only when the deceleration rate exceeds a certain level to warn a driver behind to decelerate as well. Illuminating brake lights to maintain a constant speed, a 0 deceleration rate, is unnecessary because the driver behind would not need to decelerate. This brake light behavior occurs in ICE vehicles because the brake lights are illuminated by a switch on the brake pedal that doesn't know whether deceleration is occurring.
A good counterargument might be that on a descent, the driver behind might not be paying attention such that his vehicle is accelerating down the descent (e.g.,
@Bat66's motorcycle experience). By illuminating the brake lights while descending, even when not decelerating, the driver behind would be alerted to control the speed of his vehicle.
I can't think of a situation in which brake light illumination being tied to regen power alone wouldn't also work correctly when decelerating. Whenever an i3's brake pedal is pressed, regen also begins, even when in 'N', so a certain regen power level would function light a brake pedal switch. No need for an accelerometer to control brake light illumination..