Stevei3
Well-known member
Hi guys,
what's your (or could I, as fellow i3 enthusiast, say: our) take on the MB B ED ?
I'll kick off the disussion, please, no bashing, by stating that the MB looks like the bigger car. The difference seems to be sort of subjective though. A kind of trick of the mind because of i3s large wheels one would guess. I overlayed the drawings of both cars in Photoshop and it looks like much of the extra length (~60% of 360mm) is 'wasted' on the front of the car. Well, not wasted altogether I guess, for the front mounted electric motor doesn't cause the boot floor to be raised like in the i3.
And I've got a question about E consumption. It seems that MB uses a 36kWh batterypack with 28kWh of it usable (as standard, without range booster). This seems to cater for a (EPA?) range of 87 miles. Could the difference of 81 miles out of 18.8 kWh and 87 out of 28 be explained bij the curb weight alone ? Or is MB suffering from the same confusion-generating system as BMW ?
Regards, Steven
what's your (or could I, as fellow i3 enthusiast, say: our) take on the MB B ED ?
I'll kick off the disussion, please, no bashing, by stating that the MB looks like the bigger car. The difference seems to be sort of subjective though. A kind of trick of the mind because of i3s large wheels one would guess. I overlayed the drawings of both cars in Photoshop and it looks like much of the extra length (~60% of 360mm) is 'wasted' on the front of the car. Well, not wasted altogether I guess, for the front mounted electric motor doesn't cause the boot floor to be raised like in the i3.
And I've got a question about E consumption. It seems that MB uses a 36kWh batterypack with 28kWh of it usable (as standard, without range booster). This seems to cater for a (EPA?) range of 87 miles. Could the difference of 81 miles out of 18.8 kWh and 87 out of 28 be explained bij the curb weight alone ? Or is MB suffering from the same confusion-generating system as BMW ?
Regards, Steven